AI Disclosure Policy
1. Purpose of This Policy
This AI Disclosure Policy explains how ReportMax uses artificial intelligence, what the AI does and does not do, how your data is protected during AI processing, and what obligations you have as the reporting officer. Transparency about AI involvement in law enforcement documentation is fundamental to our design.
2. What AI Does in ReportMax
ReportMax uses the Anthropic Claude API to perform a single, specific function: generating a first-person draft narrative based on the facts the officer types. The AI:
- Reads the officer's tokenized input (see Section 4 for how PII is protected)
- Generates a structured, first-person draft narrative organized in chronological order
- Uses the officer's stated facts only — it does not consult external databases, body camera footage, dispatch records, or any other source
- Inserts bracketed placeholders (e.g., [MISSING: time of incident]) when critical facts are absent rather than inventing them
- Applies formatting appropriate to the selected report type (Incident Report, Traffic Stop, Arrest Narrative, Use of Force, DUI Supplement, Crash Report)
3. What AI Does Not Do
The AI in ReportMax:
- Does not verify facts. The AI has no way to confirm whether the facts you enter are accurate. It generates a draft based solely on what you type.
- Does not access any law enforcement database. The AI has no connection to NCIC, your agency's RMS, CAD systems, body camera footage, or any external data source.
- Does not make legal conclusions. Unless explicitly provided by the officer, the AI does not determine probable cause, add charge elements, or draw legal conclusions.
- Does not file or submit reports. No AI-generated content is transmitted to any agency system. The officer copies, reviews, edits, and submits the final report through their agency's own systems.
- Does not learn from your reports. ReportMax does not use report content to train, fine-tune, or evaluate any AI model.
- Does not guarantee accuracy. AI-generated text may contain errors, hallucinations, omissions, or awkward phrasing. Officer review is mandatory before any report is certified or filed.
4. Privacy Protection During AI Processing
Before any data reaches the AI, ReportMax's client-side tokenization automatically replaces personally identifiable information with opaque placeholder tokens:
This means the AI never processes or stores real subject names, addresses, dates of birth, phone numbers, or license plate numbers. The token-to-value mapping exists only in your browser's session memory and is discarded when you close or reset the report.
5. Mandatory Disclosure in Every Report
Every report generated by ReportMax includes a mandatory AI disclosure, both on-screen and in any printed or exported document. The disclosure reads:
This disclosure cannot be removed by officers or regular users. It is always present in the internal audit log.
6. Officer Certification Requirement
Before copying or printing any AI-generated narrative, you are required to certify the following statement:
This certification is recorded with your name and timestamp in ReportMax's audit log. It confirms that a human officer reviewed the AI draft and accepts responsibility for the final report. Certification does not transfer any legal responsibility to ReportMax or its operators.
7. Audit Trail
Every AI generation event is recorded in a tamper-evident, cryptographically hash-chained audit log. The log captures:
- Officer identity and timestamp
- Report type selected
- Whether generation succeeded
- Character count of generated output
- Officer certification event (when the report is exported or copied)
Audit log entries cannot be altered or deleted by officers. This log provides an accountability record of all AI-assisted drafting activity.
8. Known Limitations of AI Drafts
Officers must be aware of the following before relying on any AI-generated draft:
- Hallucination risk: AI models can generate plausible-sounding but factually incorrect statements. Every sentence must be verified against your notes and direct knowledge of the incident.
- Entity detection gaps: Unusual name formats or abbreviations may not be detected by the tokenizer and could be passed to the AI as-is. Review the final output for any sensitive identifiers.
- Context limits: Very long or complex incidents may result in condensed or incomplete narratives. Add missing details directly in the editable output before finalizing.
- Tone and style: AI-generated prose reflects general law enforcement writing conventions and may not match your agency's specific style guide. Edit to conform to agency standards.
- Legal sufficiency: AI output does not constitute legal review. Supervisors and legal counsel remain responsible for evaluating the sufficiency of reports.
Human-in-the-Loop
Every report requires active officer review and certification. AI assists drafting only — it never produces a final report.
Transparency Always
Every exported report permanently discloses AI involvement. This cannot be removed or suppressed.
Privacy by Architecture
Tokenization protects subject PII before transmission. The AI never sees real subject names or identifiers.
No AI Training
Your report content is never used to train, fine-tune, or evaluate any AI model.
9. Questions and Contact
Questions about how AI is used in ReportMax? Contact us at admin@reportmax.support. For agency-level AI governance documentation, contact us directly.